Mar 242012
 

On March 5th, "Kony 2012", a bril­liant, touch­ing and shock­ing, 30min video was posted on youtube, aimed to raise aware­ness of the abduc­tion and abuse of child sol­diers in Africa. The video was designed so well, it hit the soft spots of over 70 mil­lion view­ers in less than a week. A mas­ter­piece of mar­ket­ing that gath­ered the sup­port of mil­lions includ­ing celebri­ties and politi­cians. An instant suc­cess for Invis­i­ble Chil­dren — the NGO that decided to focus on an issue that, for decades, has been of lit­tle inter­est in main­stream media.

Only a few days after its release some­thing utterly bizarre and inter­est­ing hap­pened. Main­stream media and even many alter­na­tives aggres­sively attacked the film-maker for alleged inac­cu­ra­cies and inap­pro­pri­ate profit motifs. How­ever, they all agree that Joseph Kony is a "bad" guy and deserves to be elim­i­nated and that child sol­diers are a big and long-term prob­lem in some African countries.

Soon after the enor­mous rapid suc­cess fol­lowed an "intu­itive" hos­tile reac­tion of the media. Jason Rus­sel, co-founder of Invis­i­ble Chil­dren, who also fea­tured in the video along with his five year old son, suf­fered some­thing I would sim­ply call a pub­lic nervous-breakdown. Sud­denly the news pages were full of sto­ries about the his men­tal health break­down but also sto­ries that dive deeper into the issue of child sol­diers in Africa (now that the topic is popular).

Kony 2012

Kony 2012: Rais­ing aware­ness of 3 decades of child sol­diers and abuse in Africa. Joseph Kony is wanted for "crimes against humanity".

The video aimed to pres­sure the US gov­ern­ment to pro­vide more sup­port to cap­ture the uncon­tro­ver­sial fero­cious crim­i­nal Joseph Kony. I would have pre­ferred to see a col­lab­o­ra­tive effort of e.g. the UN — but hey, we are talk­ing about a few hun­dred troops or so to assist local gov­ern­ment forces to cap­ture the bad guy. This is hardly an Amer­i­can "inva­sion" in Africa.

So far the video has been crit­i­cised for the fol­low­ing points:

  • Uganda is not any more affected by Kony's organ­i­sa­tion the Lord's Resis­tance Army (LRA) — although it has been until 2006. Appar­ently Kony has moved on  to other ter­ri­to­ries. This was also some­thing the Uganda gov­ern­ment was quick to point out try­ing to save the pub­lic image of Uganda
  • Uganda like other African coun­tries have many other and big­ger prob­lems than thou­sands of abused child sol­diers forced to mur­der­ing their par­ents among others
  • a too high bud­get for the mak­ing of the movie (they could have used the money in bet­ter ways)
  • that he omit­ted that the cur­rent Uganda gov­ern­ment came to power using child soldiers
  • a five year old — like the film mak­ers son fea­tured in the video should not know about these issues
  • Invis­i­ble Chil­dren encour­ages every­one to raise aware­ness of the issue on one par­tic­u­lar day and pro­vides adver­tis­ing kits in exchange for money
  • Suc­cess­ful mar­ket­ing by  appeal­ing to the feel­ings of view­ers is painted as "pro­pa­ganda" [Note: the same media call polit­i­cal cam­paigns, phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­mer­cials etc. great and nec­es­sary adver­tis­ing or even pub­lic relations. ]

I could now post a list of praised celebri­ties, politi­cians, CEOs, Hol­ly­wood block­busters, daily news, com­mer­cials that would make the above listed short­com­ings (in terms of ethics or accu­racy of infor­ma­tion)  fade in com­par­i­son. But I won't as I think the point I am try­ing to make is obvi­ous.
Mak­ing money with a good cause appar­ently is uneth­i­cal and so is good adver­tis­ing or sim­pli­fi­ca­tion. The growth depen­dent and profit eat­ing "beast" — our cho­sen eco­nomic sys­tem — is telling us that we must not let good things ben­e­fit from the sys­tem. At least there is much more ben­e­fit (profit) in bad­mouthing any­thing progressive.

I praise the  Kony 2012 video for the fol­low­ing points:

  • effec­tively bring­ing the topic of child sol­diers and other African issues into the main­stream discussion
  • rais­ing aware­ness of media des­per­ate to ride every pos­si­ble wave by turn­ing pos­i­tive devel­op­ments  into bet­ter sell­ing bad news
  • per­mit­ting peo­ple to realise how mak­ing money with a good cause is con­sid­ered uneth­i­cal by our eco­nomic sys­tem with the media act­ing as gate­keep­ers. The same media par­tic­i­pate and pro­mote throw­ing mil­lions at so-called celebri­ties who do noth­ing else than act­ing as if they were some­one else or bonuses of bankers and politi­cians who mis­er­ably fail doing their jobs.

This phe­nom­e­nal aware­ness boost­ing video, almost as a side­line, effec­tively revealed the dan­ger­ous lack of objec­tive and cit­i­zen friendly, mean­ing­ful report­ing in the media. It is not infor­ma­tion but sen­sa­tion­al­ism that mat­ters in terms of profit. Unfor­tu­nately a good cause will never sell as well as a bad one in our cur­rent eco­nomic environment.

I wish Jason Rus­sell, the bril­liant film maker and co-founder of  Invis­i­ble Chil­dren, a fast recov­ery and the sup­port he deserves for his fan­tas­tic job.

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Share on StumbleUpon
Bookmark this on Digg
Share on LinkedIn

  4 Responses to “Kony 2012 — What is wrong with the media?”

Comments (4)
  1. Couldn't have said it bet­ter myself Jason! A very well writ­ten piece. Mx

    • Thanks, I really do appre­ci­ate all feed­back from real humans and non-spammers or netvo­cates (peo­ple paid for trolling and spread­ing pro­pa­ganda in blogs). You seem to be a fine exam­ple (of a gen­uine human) — this is encouraging!

  2. Hi Jason!
    I agree with your point, that rais­ing aware­ness and sym­pa­thy in that group of peo­ple you men­tioned is a good cause. How­ever nowa­days, I'm exposed to thou­sands of oppor­tu­ni­ties to donate for plenty of good ini­tia­tives. Ini­tially I'm bound to be scep­ti­cal and reluc­tant due to var­i­ous rea­sons..
    I'd like to know, how you deal with peo­ple try­ing to con­vince you to donate for some­thing they regard as being cru­cial (often pas­sion is included, which makes you feel­ing even more bad to refuse)?
    Sec­ondly, do you donate? If yes, for what and where and how do you draw the line? If not, what are your rea­sons?
    Greet­ings from a ger­man guy you met in Fin­land in a library:)

    • Hi Joon,

      Good ques­tion!
      Per­son­ally I like to focus my ener­gies on attack­ing the sources rather than symp­toms. Can­cer, depres­sion, war, tor­ture, famine, pol­lu­tion etc are symp­toms of the way peo­ple live on this planet. Treat­ing symp­toms may make sense in the short term but even­tu­ally the source needs to be addressed. I think the source is an out­dated eco­nomic par­a­digm. Toby Rus­sel describes it brilliantly:

      When it takes a good pro­por­tion of us to cre­ate the goods and ser­vices we buy and sell to live and enjoy life, the money-circulation sys­tem we have is quite good.
      When there is plenty of room for growth, even the much maligned pos­i­tive inter­est debt sys­tem we have is ok.

      But when we have no room to grow and very low need for human labour, when Con­sumerism is increas­ingly seen as a hol­low and unsat­is­fy­ing rat race going nowhere, the money cir­cu­la­tion sys­tem we have breaks down.

      That’s the easy part.

      Break­ing down our millennia-old ideas about value, work, util­ity and pro­duc­tiv­ity is far harder. And that is the trap we are in.

      Hence, I try to sup­port every­thing that helps break down the source — the mal­func­tion­ing paradigm.

      For exam­ple, I support:

      1. the free, uncen­sored Inter­net to bypass the fil­tered cor­po­rate media and allow non profit shar­ing of news and services
      2. aban­don elec­tronic vot­ing machines to allow for a non vio­lent régime change
      3. aban­don the utterly unde­mo­c­ra­tic busi­ness of mar­ket­ing politicians
      4. to fight cor­po­rate spon­sored and owned media. The media need to serve the peo­ple not the adver­tis­ing com­pa­nies or shareholders.
      5. sup­port believ­able politi­cians with a track record of fol­low­ing the con­sti­tu­tion with­out get­ting stuck in e.g. abor­tion dis­cus­sions or other details
      6. recog­nise adver­tis­ing and mar­ket­ing as the soul of unsus­tain­able con­sumerism and refuse to par­tic­i­pate in it — instead fight it.

      Inci­dently, my favourite activist site is cur­rently under heavy cyber-attack. They are doing am out­stand­ing job fight­ing for Inter­net free­dom and many other worth­while causes with the help of mil­lions of Inter­net users worldwide.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>